Literatur
INTF
Mink, G. 1993. «Eine umfassende Genealogie der neutestamentlichen Überlieferung». New Testament Studies 39:481-499. (Methodische Vorstudie)
Mink, G. 2000. «Editing and Genealogical Studies: the New Testament». Literary and Linguistic Computing 15:51-56. (Arbeitsbericht)
Mink, G. 2003. «Was verändert sich in der Textkritik durch die Beachtung genealogischer Kohärenz?». Recent Developments in Textual Criticism. New Testament, other Early Christian and Jewish Literature, hrsg. von W. Weren und D.-A. Koch, [39]-68. (Grundlegendes Modell, Kohärenz, Textflussdiagramme, praktische Anwendungen und Ergebnisse)
Mink, G. 2004. «Problems of a Highly Contaminated Tradition: the New Testament. Stemmata of variants as a source of a genealogy for witnesses». Studies in Stemmatology II, hrsg. von P. van Reenen, A. den Hollander und M. van Mulken, [13]-85. Online-Version hier, Corrigenda hier. (contamination as a process, brief outline of the method: some definitions, procedures, typical problems of contamination, priority variants found only in non-ancestors, undirected edges, circular edges, intermediary nodes, construction of a global stemma)
Mink, G. 2009. Introductory Presentation
Mink, G. 2011. «Contamination, Coherence, and Coincidence in Textual Transmission», The Textual History of the Greek New Testament. Changing Views in Contemporary Research, hg. v. Klaus Wachtel und Michael W. Holmes, (SBL Text-Critical Studies 8) Atlanta 2011.
Mink, G. 2020. «Manuscripts, Texts, History, and the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM): Some Thoughts and Clarifications«, in: D.C. Parker, H.A.G. Houghton und H. Strutwolf (Hg.), The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium. Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel (ANTF 52; Berlin und Boston: de Gruyter, 2019), 281-293.
Mink, G. 2020. Remarks on Carlson, “A Bias at the Heart of the CBGM”, NTVMR Blogpost
Paulson, G. 2020. «Improving the CBGM: Recent Interactions», in: D.C. Parker, H.A.G. Houghton und H. Strutwolf (Hg.), The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium. Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel (ANTF 52; Berlin und Boston: de Gruyter, 2019), 295-307.
Paulson, G. 2020. Cracking open the “Black Box”. How To Download And Edit Your Own CBGM (And Why This Might Be Fun). Online presentation
Strutwolf, H. 2011. «Scribal Practices and the Transmission of Biblical Texts: New Insights from the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method», Editing the Bible. Assessing the task past and present, hg. v. John S. Kloppenborg und Judith H. Newman, Atlanta 2012, 139-160.
Strutwolf, H. 2020 «Von den Kanones der Textkritik zu einer Theorie der Variantenentstehung im Rahmen der Kohärenzbasierten Genealogischen Methode. Einige vorläufige Überlegungen», in: D.C. Parker, H.A.G. Houghton und H. Strutwolf (Hg.), The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium. Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel (ANTF 52; Berlin und Boston: de Gruyter, 2019), 265-280.
Wachtel, K. 2008. «Towards a Redefinition of External Criteria: The Role of Coherence in Assessing the Origin of Variants», Textual Variation: Theological and Social Tendencies? Hrsg. von H.A.G. Houghton and D.C. Parker, (Texts and Studies 6, 3rd series) Piscataway: Gorgias Press 2008, p. 109-127.
Wachtel, K./Spencer, M./Howe, C.: «Representing Multiple Pathways of Textual Flow in the Greek Manuscripts of the Letter of James Using Reduced Median Networks», Computers and the Humanities 38 (2004) 1-14.
Wachtel, K. 2011. «The Coherence-Based Genealogical Method: A New Way to Reconstruct the Text of the Greek New Testament», Editing the Bible. Assessing the task past and present, hg. v. John S. Kloppenborg und Judith H. Newman, Atlanta 2012, 123-138.
Wachtel, K. 2019. «The Development of the Coherence Based Genealogical Method (CBGM), its Place in Textual Scholarship, and Digital Editing», in: Garrick Allen (ed.), The Future of New Testament Textual Scholarship — From H.C. Hoskier to the Editio Critica Maior and Beyond, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2019, 433-444.
Wachtel, K. 2020. «Die kohärenzbasierte Methode und ihre Ergebnisse für die neutestamentliche Textgeschichte.» In: S. Kreuzer, M. Karrer (Hg.): Trifaria varietas? — Entstehung, Entwicklung und Problematik des Konzepts von Rezensionen des biblischen Textes. Biblische Notizen 184 (2020) 43-72. Online: https://www.herder.de/bn-nf/hefte/archiv/2020/184-2020/
Externe Beiträge
Edmondson, Andrew Charles 2019. An Analysis of the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method Using Phylogenetics. Online:https://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/9150/.
Gurry, Peter 2016. How your Greek NT is Changing: A Simple Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM), JETS 59 (2016) 675Ð89.
Gurry, P. 2017. A Critical Examination of the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method in New Testament Textual Criticism, Leiden und Boston: Brill, 2017.
Wasserman, T. and Gurry, P. 2017. A new approach to textual criticism: an introduction to the coherence-based genealogical method, Atlanta: SBL Press 2017.
